Only 10% of SOCs Say They’re Getting Excellent Value From AI. Here’s What the Second Wave Has to Deliver

Summary: Eighteen months ago, the AI SOC was a marketing line. Today it's a budget item. The category has crossed over from interesting to inevitable, with billions of dollars now flowing into AI-powered security operations platforms, agentic SOC tools, and AI co-pilots built into every layer of the security stack. The data shows SOCs are buying, deploying, and standing up AI capabilities at the fastest

By MSB

Artificial intelligence is rapidly becoming a central component of modern cybersecurity strategies, yet a new industry survey suggests that many security operations centers (SOCs) are still struggling to realize its full potential. Despite widespread investment in AI-powered security tools, only a small percentage of security teams report achieving significant operational benefits from their deployments, highlighting the gap between expectations and real-world implementation.

The findings come at a time when organizations are facing unprecedented pressure. Security teams must defend increasingly complex environments, manage growing volumes of alerts, respond to sophisticated cyber threats, and address persistent staffing shortages. AI has been widely promoted as a solution capable of automating routine tasks, accelerating threat detection, and helping analysts focus on the most critical incidents.

However, the survey indicates that the reality is often more complicated. While many organizations have adopted AI-powered security technologies, relatively few report experiencing the dramatic efficiency improvements frequently promised by vendors. For many SOCs, implementation challenges, integration issues, data quality problems, and operational complexity continue to limit the technology’s impact.

One of the primary obstacles is that artificial intelligence is not a plug-and-play solution. Effective deployment requires high-quality data, well-defined processes, skilled personnel, and security platforms capable of integrating AI insights into existing workflows. Organizations that lack these foundations may struggle to generate meaningful value from even the most advanced AI tools.

Security analysts also face challenges related to trust and transparency. AI systems can identify anomalies, prioritize alerts, and recommend actions, but analysts often need to understand why a particular recommendation was generated before acting on it. When AI outputs lack sufficient context or explainability, teams may be reluctant to rely on automated decisions for critical security operations.

Another issue involves alert fatigue. Many organizations hoped AI would significantly reduce the volume of security alerts requiring human review. While some tools have improved prioritization and triage processes, security teams continue to report large numbers of notifications, false positives, and competing signals that require manual investigation.

The survey reflects a broader trend occurring across the technology industry. Artificial intelligence is delivering measurable benefits in many areas, but successful implementation often requires organizational changes that extend beyond simply purchasing new software. Companies must adapt workflows, train personnel, and establish governance frameworks to fully capitalize on AI-driven capabilities.

Despite the challenges, enthusiasm for AI within cybersecurity remains strong. Security leaders recognize that threat actors are increasingly leveraging automation and artificial intelligence to enhance phishing campaigns, accelerate vulnerability discovery, and scale malicious operations. As attackers adopt more advanced technologies, defenders feel growing pressure to modernize their own capabilities.

Many experts believe that AI’s greatest value in security operations may come from augmentation rather than replacement. Instead of eliminating the need for analysts, AI can help automate repetitive tasks, summarize investigations, correlate large volumes of data, and surface insights that might otherwise be overlooked. This allows human experts to focus on higher-level decision-making and incident response.

The survey results also highlight the continuing cybersecurity skills shortage. Organizations frequently view AI as a way to compensate for limited staffing resources, but technology alone cannot fully replace experienced security professionals. The most successful deployments often occur when AI is used to enhance the effectiveness of existing teams rather than serve as a substitute for them.

As AI technologies continue to mature, many of today’s implementation challenges may become easier to overcome. Improvements in explainability, automation, data integration, and workflow orchestration are expected to increase the value that security teams derive from AI-powered platforms over time.

For now, the findings serve as a reminder that artificial intelligence is not a silver bullet for cybersecurity. While the technology offers significant promise, achieving meaningful results requires careful planning, realistic expectations, and a willingness to adapt operational practices alongside technological investments.

The future SOC will almost certainly be powered by AI in some capacity. The question is no longer whether artificial intelligence will play a role in cybersecurity operations, but how effectively organizations can integrate it into their workflows to produce measurable improvements in security outcomes.

Key facts

  • Only 10% of SOCs report receiving excellent value from AI
  • Billions of dollars are being invested in AI-powered security operations platforms, agentic SOC tools, and AI co-pilots
  • AI capabilities are being bought, deployed, and stood up by SOCs at a rapid pace
  • The AI SOC has transitioned from a marketing concept to a significant budget item over the past eighteen months

Why it matters

The findings suggest a significant gap between the hype and the reality of AI adoption in cybersecurity operations. As SOCs continue to invest heavily in these solutions, the lack of perceived value could lead to reassessment of strategies, vendor consolidation, and increased pressure on AI security providers to demonstrate tangible ROI and improved threat detection and response capabilities.